Walmart wants to turn its big-box store on Winnipeg’s Regent Avenue into a supercentre. Councillor Russ Wyatt says the city should require improved access for motor vehicles and bicycles, as well as trees to soften a bleak parking lot vista. The city’s chief administrative officer, Phil Sheegl, says he’s concerned about the developmental fallout from a negative decision.
In the city’s interest, Mr. Sheegl should perhaps be more concerned about the fallout from a positive decision. A series of studies covering Walmart and similar big box developments, summarized here, suggest that neither Mr. Wyatt nor Mr. Sheegl are taking a sufficiently critical look at this development proposal.
According to these studies, big box stores:
- Eliminate more jobs than they create.
- Are far more expensive to service than neighbourhood stores, and can actually produce a net loss of tax revenues.
- Offer less spin-off to the local economy, because they are less likely to purchase goods and services locally.
- Are not likely to increase the level of competition and consumer choice in the local economy – in fact, are likely to reduce it, by driving smaller businesses out of the market and subsequently raising their own prices.
Here’s the kicker: Requiring modification of big-box development proposals, or even turning them down, does not necessarily produce the untoward “developmental fallouts” Mr. Sheegl fears. On the contrary, there is good reason to believe that turning down big-box development proposals may have more positive than negative impacts on the local economy. All of this does not necessarily prove that this particular Walmart supercentre development is the wrong way to go. The real cause for concern is that discussion of the proposal focuses on details like trees and access, while apparently ignoring the wider implications of this development for Winnipeg’s economy.
This will not be the first time that Winnipeg has accepted development proposals without thinking through their implications, and, realistically, it’s unlikely that this will change in the foreseeable future, but it’s never too late to start. A growing number of cities are getting good results from a more critical approach to big box development. A good start would be an economic impact study that takes a serious look at the implications, and the alternatives. For a checklist of the kinds of questions City Council and city officials should be asking, click here, and go to p. 83.
For more on the economic impact of Walmart developments, look up:
David Neumark, Junfu Zhang and Stephen Ciccarella. (2008). The effects of Wal-Mart on local labor markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 63 (2), pages 405-430.
For a study of Walmart and American culture, with obvious implications for Canadian culture, get:
Bethany Moreton. (2010). To serve God and Wal-Mart: The making of Christian free enterprise. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.